SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Cheyenne County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 352
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Cheyenne County, Kansas totaled $6,017,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Roger A Orth | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $21,745 |
82 | L J Kamla | Bird City, KS 67731 | $21,231 |
83 | Patrick R Stuart | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $21,162 |
84 | Steven C Workman | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $20,794 |
85 | Blake Feikert | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $20,326 |
86 | Fleda M Raile | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $20,110 |
87 | Betty A Bloom | Denver, CO 80221 | $20,059 |
88 | Raymond Zimbelman | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $19,980 |
89 | L A Bunjes | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $19,831 |
90 | Bracelin Brothers | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $19,794 |
91 | Troy D Burr | Bird City, KS 67731 | $18,596 |
92 | Irene Rae White | Haigler, NE 69030 | $18,442 |
93 | Daniel - D & L Busse Family Trust - P Busse | Bird City, KS 67731 | $17,636 |
94 | Detter Heirs | Windsor, CO 80550 | $17,410 |
95 | Helen Brubaker Trust | Bird City, KS 67731 | $17,246 |
96 | Olathe D Juhl | Goodland, KS 67735 | $17,156 |
97 | Robert Ketzner | Wichita, KS 67235 | $16,294 |
98 | Donald K Krien | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $15,602 |
99 | Danny Workman | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $15,495 |
100 | Charles Workman | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $15,281 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”