Conservation Reserve Program in Cheyenne County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 322
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Cheyenne County, Kansas totaled $1,234,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Maria Garcia-alcarazo | Bird City, KS 67731 | $3,367 |
122 | Daniel Stephens | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $3,359 |
123 | Matthew J Bandel | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $3,334 |
124 | Lois Sparr | Renton, WA 98058 | $3,274 |
125 | Robyn R Raile | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $3,218 |
126 | Timothy - Tim & Robyn Raile Trust - Raile | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $3,218 |
127 | Brett M Petersen | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $3,217 |
128 | Keith H Mccall Rev Trust | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $3,199 |
129 | C Lynnette Nolan | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $3,179 |
130 | Jan Keller-vap | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $3,145 |
131 | Flying S Ranch Inc | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $3,086 |
132 | Patricia G Schieffer | Leawood, KS 66209 | $2,967 |
133 | , | $2,913 | |
134 | L Dean Knapp & Theresa Knapp Rev Lvg Trust | Bird City, KS 67731 | $2,886 |
135 | Wailes Farms Inc | Strasburg, CO 80136 | $2,858 |
136 | Emily Vallin | Long Island, KS 67647 | $2,825 |
137 | Tcsh LLC | Berthoud, CO 80513 | $2,812 |
138 | Perry Keller | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $2,757 |
139 | Frederick H Kamla | Bird City, KS 67731 | $2,749 |
140 | Teresa M Sowers-moore | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $2,702 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”