Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Cheyenne County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 163
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Cheyenne County, Kansas totaled $1,476,000 in in 2022.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rethke Farms LLC | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $69,613 |
| 2 | Rath Ranch Llp | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $69,447 |
| 3 | Jonathan B Waters | Bird City, KS 67731 | $56,845 |
| 4 | M John Keller Family Farms Inc | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $50,899 |
| 5 | Antholz Farm & Ranch LLC | Mc Donald, KS 67745 | $50,565 |
| 6 | , | $40,243 | |
| 7 | Ron G Maifeld | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $40,151 |
| 8 | Albert Keller Farms Inc | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $31,949 |
| 9 | Steven C Workman | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $29,419 |
| 10 | Bracelin Farm LLC | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $29,399 |
| 11 | Michael Thomas Bandel | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $28,776 |
| 12 | Douthit-downey Land & Cattle LLC | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $27,912 |
| 13 | Danny Workman | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $25,050 |
| 14 | Perry Keller | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $24,888 |
| 15 | Larry Schultz | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $24,499 |
| 16 | Sunny Crest Farm LLC | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $23,435 |
| 17 | , | $21,651 | |
| 18 | Jim Dunn | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $21,263 |
| 19 | Stephen Douthit Family Farms Inc | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $20,033 |
| 20 | James T Culwell | Bird City, KS 67731 | $19,514 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
