Direct Payment Program in Cheyenne County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,595
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Cheyenne County, Kansas totaled $45,601,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 4-c's Partnership | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $1,129,738 |
2 | Sunny Crest Farm | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $640,122 |
3 | Kent & Joan Banister Partnership | Mc Donald, KS 67745 | $555,095 |
4 | Smith Farms | Bird City, KS 67731 | $540,370 |
5 | Wt Partnership | Bird City, KS 67731 | $469,318 |
6 | Walden Farms | Bird City, KS 67731 | $450,571 |
7 | Hendricks Bros Partnership | Bird City, KS 67731 | $414,693 |
8 | Fairview Farms Inc | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $408,907 |
9 | Albert Keller Farms Inc | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $390,797 |
10 | Cory D Busse | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $370,917 |
11 | Bandel Bros | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $363,143 |
12 | Bracelin Brothers | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $361,900 |
13 | R Joe Kramer | Brewster, KS 67732 | $342,291 |
14 | Roger R Zweygardt | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $339,443 |
15 | M John Keller Family Farms Inc | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $326,605 |
16 | Jonathan B Waters | Bird City, KS 67731 | $323,522 |
17 | H Daryl Loyd | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $323,153 |
18 | Douthit Brothers | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $308,793 |
19 | Zaz Farms Inc | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $301,692 |
20 | Mark J Roesener | Mc Donald, KS 67745 | $300,740 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>