Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Cheyenne County, Kansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 184
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Cheyenne County, Kansas totaled $722,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rethke Farms LLC | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $150,667 |
2 | Flying S Ranch Inc | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $48,222 |
3 | Cody J Whitney | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $28,823 |
4 | Robert L Ochsner | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $27,364 |
5 | Robert Wade Ochsner | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $21,616 |
6 | James Theron Culwell Trust No 1 | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $19,911 |
7 | Quad View Ranch LLC | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $15,853 |
8 | Rath Ranch Llp | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $14,956 |
9 | , | $11,266 | |
10 | Larry Schultz | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $11,177 |
11 | Jonathan B Waters | Bird City, KS 67731 | $10,985 |
12 | M John Keller Family Farms Inc | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $9,834 |
13 | Antholz Farm & Ranch LLC | Mc Donald, KS 67745 | $9,797 |
14 | , | $9,602 | |
15 | Ron G Maifeld | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $7,998 |
16 | Albert Keller Farms Inc | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $7,399 |
17 | Douthit-downey Land & Cattle LLC | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $6,458 |
18 | Terrence C Jensen | Bird City, KS 67731 | $6,424 |
19 | , | $6,086 | |
20 | Dennis Krien | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $6,043 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>