Counter Cyclical Program in Clay County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,068
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Clay County, Kansas totaled $2,438,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Longford Mill Products Inc | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $18,439 |
22 | Lloyds Inc | Palmer, KS 66962 | $16,671 |
23 | Bauer Farms Inc | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $16,158 |
24 | Richard Chestnut | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $16,144 |
25 | Marvin L Steenbock Trust No1 | Longford, KS 67458 | $15,777 |
26 | Allen Leidig | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $15,199 |
27 | Arlan Sump | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $14,860 |
28 | Rickey Kahrs | Morganville, KS 67468 | $14,688 |
29 | Steven V Peterson Revocable Trust | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $14,189 |
30 | 5b Farm Inc | Clifton, KS 66937 | $14,051 |
31 | Elsasser Farms Inc | Clifton, KS 66937 | $13,944 |
32 | Robert J Wietharn Trust No 1 | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $13,798 |
33 | Roth Farms | Green, KS 67447 | $13,463 |
34 | Siebold Farms LLC | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $13,190 |
35 | Lindy F Knoettgen Rev Trust | Clifton, KS 66937 | $12,789 |
36 | Carroll R Adams Inc | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $12,619 |
37 | Galen F Wietharn Trust No 1 | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $12,274 |
38 | Roger Newell | Clifton, KS 66937 | $12,098 |
39 | Kellan Kopfer | Oakhill, KS 67432 | $11,882 |
40 | Smith Trust Partnership | Manhattan, KS 66503 | $11,752 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”