Conservation Reserve Program in Cloud County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 88
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Cloud County, Kansas totaled $206,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Dale Berk | Concordia, KS 66901 | $646 |
62 | Matthew E Miller | Concordia, KS 66901 | $574 |
63 | Castonguay Family Irrevocable Trust | Gardner, KS 66030 | $558 |
64 | Julia Stanford Hysom Revocable Trust | Concordia, KS 66901 | $525 |
65 | Gerald H Gallagher & Mary Jane Gallagher Rev Tr | Concordia, KS 66901 | $508 |
66 | Marjorie A Asper | Livingston, TX 77351 | $390 |
67 | Jacob Charles Charbonneau | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $390 |
68 | Joyce M Sigle Irr Tr | Longview, WA 98632 | $372 |
69 | , | $370 | |
70 | Frank Grosse | Jamestown, KS 66948 | $360 |
71 | Rao Inc | Kingman, KS 67068 | $355 |
72 | Rmh Investments LLC | Salina, KS 67401 | $338 |
73 | Mary K Cummins | Aurora, KS 67417 | $294 |
74 | Nancy J Simpson | Baton Rouge, LA 70816 | $293 |
75 | Janette K Gelvin Trust | Pleasant Hill, MO 64080 | $255 |
76 | Deanna Sweat | Jamestown, KS 66948 | $255 |
77 | June F Knox | Edmond, OK 73034 | $255 |
78 | Chad Burt Trust | Olathe, KS 66062 | $245 |
79 | Mikel Lee Derek Henning | Glasco, KS 67445 | $238 |
80 | Kurtis B Kocher Family Trust | Glasco, KS 67445 | $197 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”