Counter Cyclical Program in Cloud County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,098
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Cloud County, Kansas totaled $2,532,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Dale Berk | Concordia, KS 66901 | $8,184 |
82 | D & G Deneault Farms Inc | Concordia, KS 66901 | $7,998 |
83 | Dean Morgan | Concordia, KS 66901 | $7,835 |
84 | Ronald D Dorman Rev Inter Vivos Tr | Concordia, KS 66901 | $7,746 |
85 | Randy A Lange | Miltonvale, KS 67466 | $7,746 |
86 | Frederick J Detrixhe | Concordia, KS 66901 | $7,658 |
87 | Gale And Irma Ethridge Rev Trust | Glasco, KS 67445 | $7,652 |
88 | Wayne E Ruud Land & Cattle Trust | Concordia, KS 66901 | $7,406 |
89 | Brent Close | Clyde, KS 66938 | $7,166 |
90 | Martin S Miller | Concordia, KS 66901 | $7,047 |
91 | Stan Schmidt | Glasco, KS 67445 | $7,038 |
92 | Jack H Ransopher Revocable Trust | Clyde, KS 66938 | $7,017 |
93 | Raymond E Stein | Miltonvale, KS 67466 | $6,974 |
94 | Hardin Farms Partnership | Middletown, OH 45044 | $6,962 |
95 | Marvin E Day | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $6,747 |
96 | Larry John Nobert | Clyde, KS 66938 | $6,714 |
97 | Lorn J Schmidt Family Trust | Glasco, KS 67445 | $6,690 |
98 | Bryant Edward Thurston | Aurora, KS 67417 | $6,394 |
99 | Robert R Keiser | Concordia, KS 66901 | $6,340 |
100 | James Bachand | Clyde, KS 66938 | $6,162 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”