Farm Subsidy information
Cowley County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Cowley County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 526
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cowley County, Kansas totaled $11,828,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Aas Oil Co Inc | Arkansas City, KS 67005 | $23,644 |
62 | Phillip R Bruce | Arkansas City, KS 67005 | $23,421 |
63 | , | $23,360 | |
64 | H Duane Christenson | Arkansas City, KS 67005 | $23,326 |
65 | Lynn Kelly | Grenola, KS 67346 | $23,295 |
66 | Mcminn Trust | Burden, KS 67019 | $22,849 |
67 | Jane Barker | Atlanta, KS 67008 | $22,787 |
68 | Justin Vogele | Dexter, KS 67038 | $22,651 |
69 | Keith Stiner | Winfield, KS 67156 | $22,625 |
70 | Russel A & Pennie J Miller Rev Trust | Winfield, KS 67156 | $22,596 |
71 | Jason Holloway | Maple City, KS 67102 | $22,511 |
72 | Darrel E Jarboe | Cambridge, KS 67023 | $22,443 |
73 | Neil L Kadau | Winfield, KS 67156 | $22,300 |
74 | Mark W Martin-mark And Debra Martin Revocable Trus | Dexter, KS 67038 | $21,967 |
75 | Bryant Grain & Cattle LLC | Arkansas City, KS 67005 | $21,515 |
76 | Wyatt R Haden | Cedar Vale, KS 67024 | $21,512 |
77 | Phillip J Headrick | Atlanta, KS 67008 | $21,358 |
78 | Glenn Heath Jarboe | Cedar Vale, KS 67024 | $21,206 |
79 | Curtis J Thompson | Cedar Vale, KS 67024 | $20,014 |
80 | Richard T Cooper | Cedar Vale, KS 67024 | $19,758 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”