Market Loss Assistance Program in Cowley County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,737
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Cowley County, Kansas totaled $11,406,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Casey Woner | Rock, KS 67131 | $64,361 |
22 | Jim E Mcfarland | Rogers, AR 72756 | $63,835 |
23 | Mike E Thompson | Udall, KS 67146 | $62,380 |
24 | Roger E Schmidt | Winfield, KS 67156 | $62,089 |
25 | Mcminn Trust | Burden, KS 67019 | $60,807 |
26 | Norman L & Carole L Christenson Living Trust | Winfield, KS 67156 | $60,504 |
27 | William A Ramsey | Arkansas City, KS 67005 | $59,075 |
28 | Marvin D Hostetter | Winfield, KS 67156 | $58,758 |
29 | Lapar Dairy C/o W Whitehill | Latham, KS 67072 | $58,503 |
30 | Lawrence F & Leola M Rippe Revocable Trust | Arkansas City, KS 67005 | $58,346 |
31 | Charles C Buss Revocable Trust | Oxford, KS 67119 | $57,680 |
32 | James Dauber | Burden, KS 67019 | $57,393 |
33 | Justin Groom | Rock, KS 67131 | $57,226 |
34 | Lloyd Klein Rev Trust | Winfield, KS 67156 | $57,045 |
35 | Edward Eugene Beard | Udall, KS 67146 | $56,095 |
36 | Bossi Rev Trust Frank A | Arkansas City, KS 67005 | $54,153 |
37 | John M Lawrence | Winfield, KS 67156 | $53,838 |
38 | Robert D Voegele | Arkansas City, KS 67005 | $53,341 |
39 | Kent Crain | Arkansas City, KS 67005 | $53,254 |
40 | Lloyd D Birdzell Rev Trust | Winfield, KS 67156 | $52,909 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”