Farm Subsidy information
Crawford County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Crawford County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 3,212
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Crawford County, Kansas totaled $202,090,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Joann Rutherford | Arma, KS 66712 | $400,844 |
82 | Steven L Kuplen | Mulberry, KS 66756 | $393,046 |
83 | Charles Kruse | Hepler, KS 66746 | $380,841 |
84 | Jerry Worrell | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $374,866 |
85 | Kenneth L Geier | Girard, KS 66743 | $374,600 |
86 | Clifford Renn | Pittsburg, KS 66762 | $373,068 |
87 | Charles Grandville Fox | Walnut, KS 66780 | $372,958 |
88 | Ronald & Jane Delange Rev Trust | Girard, KS 66743 | $371,475 |
89 | William Morland Dvm | Girard, KS 66743 | $369,654 |
90 | Philip Jagels | Hepler, KS 66746 | $365,913 |
91 | James Guy | Walnut, KS 66780 | $352,254 |
92 | Ray Jones | Girard, KS 66743 | $345,104 |
93 | Hotz Farm Trust | Garden City, KS 67846 | $342,225 |
94 | Roger D Shireman | Walnut, KS 66780 | $339,646 |
95 | Amershek Dairy LLC | Mc Cune, KS 66753 | $333,246 |
96 | Edgar Vonsoosten | Girard, KS 66743 | $329,801 |
97 | Bennie Augustin Jr | Walnut, KS 66780 | $328,148 |
98 | Lennie Westervelt | Cherokee, KS 66724 | $325,182 |
99 | Leonard R Krog Rev Trust | Girard, KS 66743 | $324,473 |
100 | Douglas E Harris And Kimberly A Harris, U/t/a Dtd. | Hepler, KS 66746 | $321,718 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”