Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Decatur County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 338
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Decatur County, Kansas totaled $12,030,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Brenton R Phillips | Selden, KS 67757 | $324,185 |
2 | M & M Family Partnership | Oberlin, KS 67749 | $318,684 |
3 | Charles W Griffith | Clayton, KS 67629 | $291,141 |
4 | Sylvester Ritter Enterprises Inc | Dresden, KS 67635 | $225,096 |
5 | May Family Farms Inc | Oberlin, KS 67749 | $218,526 |
6 | Daren S Fortin | Oberlin, KS 67749 | $215,954 |
7 | Jerry Fortin | Oberlin, KS 67749 | $207,574 |
8 | Jeffrey A Rhodes | Dresden, KS 67635 | $203,252 |
9 | Bradly Rex Moore | Lawrence, KS 66047 | $200,439 |
10 | Ritter Brothers Inc | Jennings, KS 67643 | $192,484 |
11 | S. M. B. Inc | Oberlin, KS 67749 | $180,708 |
12 | Yancy J Sowers | Oberlin, KS 67749 | $173,455 |
13 | Anderson Land & Cattle Inc | Oberlin, KS 67749 | $172,573 |
14 | D L Wilson Inc | Norcatur, KS 67653 | $162,887 |
15 | James Witt | Oberlin, KS 67749 | $156,165 |
16 | Beaver Creek Farms Inc | Oberlin, KS 67749 | $154,941 |
17 | Grafel Farms LLC | Oberlin, KS 67749 | $154,941 |
18 | Bryan Farms LLC | Oberlin, KS 67749 | $152,231 |
19 | Keith Ketterl Inc | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $149,068 |
20 | 2u Farms LLC | Danbury, NE 69026 | $126,994 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>