Conservation Reserve Program in Dickinson County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,888
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Dickinson County, Kansas totaled $49,298,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Gladys Peck Trust | Enterprise, KS 67441 | $179,698 |
42 | David Wood | Solomon, KS 67480 | $179,645 |
43 | Edwin W Mcadams | Carlton, KS 67448 | $177,236 |
44 | Karen J Freeman Trust No 1 | Abilene, KS 67410 | $177,232 |
45 | Jean E Britt | Abilene, KS 67410 | $175,499 |
46 | Richard Thompson | Solomon, KS 67480 | $172,676 |
47 | Steven H Kohman Revocable Trust | Abilene, KS 67410 | $170,646 |
48 | Agnes Garten | Abilene, KS 67410 | $167,039 |
49 | Wayne E Darsow | Chapman, KS 67431 | $166,553 |
50 | Delbert F Engle | Abilene, KS 67410 | $165,643 |
51 | Enterprise Academy | Topeka, KS 66614 | $164,485 |
52 | Kenneth-kenneth M Chase Trust Chase | Abilene, KS 67410 | $164,071 |
53 | Galen D Kubin | Abilene, KS 67410 | $161,699 |
54 | Karl R Lowry Revocable Trust | Abilene, KS 67410 | $159,581 |
55 | Lawrence M Shetter Trust Agreemen | Portis, KS 67474 | $159,449 |
56 | Loren Peck Trust | Enterprise, KS 67441 | $159,410 |
57 | Jack L Loy | Chapman, KS 67431 | $157,324 |
58 | Robert F Gentz | Herington, KS 67449 | $154,152 |
59 | Delbert Presslor | Herington, KS 67449 | $153,669 |
60 | Cecil Schrader | Abilene, KS 67410 | $152,882 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”