Farm Subsidy information
Douglas County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Douglas County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 131
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Douglas County, Kansas totaled $2,869,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Charles B Kellogg | Lecompton, KS 66050 | $1,496 |
62 | Jason W Flory | Baldwin City, KS 66006 | $1,493 |
63 | Ken Lassman | Lawrence, KS 66046 | $1,449 |
64 | Douglas A Neis | Wellsville, KS 66092 | $1,391 |
65 | Betty Jo Haley Rev Trust | Lawrence, KS 66044 | $1,390 |
66 | , | $1,358 | |
67 | Juniper Hill Farms LLC | Lawrence, KS 66044 | $1,284 |
68 | Richard L Knabe Rev Trust | Eudora, KS 66025 | $1,271 |
69 | Dale E Flory | Baldwin City, KS 66006 | $1,226 |
70 | Brad A Shelley | Lawrence, KS 66047 | $1,163 |
71 | Gregory D Ellis | Overland Park, KS 66214 | $1,156 |
72 | Orville C Johanning | Baldwin City, KS 66006 | $1,155 |
73 | Harold W Irick Trust | Mission, KS 66202 | $1,155 |
74 | John F Vesecky Rev Tr | Baldwin City, KS 66006 | $1,082 |
75 | Todd Hughes | Baldwin City, KS 66006 | $1,049 |
76 | The Terrence W & Diane A Nygaard Family Irr Tr | Mission Hills, KS 66208 | $1,026 |
77 | Melissa R Dardis | Phoenix, AZ 85045 | $1,009 |
78 | Mary C Gorup | Morgans Point Resort, TX 76513 | $1,009 |
79 | Joan E Thayer Trust No 1 | Abilene, KS 67410 | $997 |
80 | Gary D Laughlin | Baldwin City, KS 66006 | $891 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”