Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Douglas County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 524
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Douglas County, Kansas totaled $6,807,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jerry Neis | Eudora, KS 66025 | $22,268 |
62 | Ted C Jehle | Baldwin City, KS 66006 | $21,886 |
63 | Ruth E Bryson Trust | Overbrook, KS 66524 | $21,653 |
64 | John C Hausman | Eudora, KS 66025 | $21,574 |
65 | Restated Don E Westheffer Revocab | Lawrence, KS 66044 | $21,376 |
66 | Darrel Harden | Berryton, KS 66409 | $20,901 |
67 | Mark Milleret | Linwood, KS 66052 | $20,591 |
68 | John Vogel Irr Trust D | Lawrence, KS 66044 | $20,283 |
69 | Jim & Larry Farms Inc | Lawrence, KS 66049 | $20,280 |
70 | Michael H Bennett Rev Trust | Baldwin City, KS 66006 | $20,102 |
71 | Mercer Gilmore | Paola, KS 66071 | $19,887 |
72 | Richard T Schlagel | Bonner Springs, KS 66012 | $19,849 |
73 | Patricia A Hood Rvoc Tr Ua 05-02-88 | Omaha, NE 68137 | $19,707 |
74 | Dan C Brune | Tempe, AZ 85282 | $19,139 |
75 | Roxana Hausman | Eudora, KS 66025 | $18,556 |
76 | William A Boehle | Eudora, KS 66025 | $17,495 |
77 | Trenton L Reavis | Baldwin City, KS 66006 | $17,433 |
78 | Lois Windett Hamilton Trust | Hot Springs Village, AR 71909 | $16,784 |
79 | Ike L Taylor | Baldwin City, KS 66006 | $15,803 |
80 | Robert B Killough | Baldwin City, KS 66006 | $15,537 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”