Production Flexibility Program in Ellis County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,806
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Ellis County, Kansas totaled $19,209,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | D & M Staab Family Trust | Hays, KS 67601 | $46,881 |
102 | Francis F Braun Rev Liv Trust | Mc Cracken, KS 67556 | $46,763 |
103 | Thomas A Schmidt | Victoria, KS 67671 | $46,607 |
104 | David Pfeifer | Ellis, KS 67637 | $46,500 |
105 | Ernest Pfeifer Jr | Ellis, KS 67637 | $46,498 |
106 | Dana Kraus | Hays, KS 67601 | $46,183 |
107 | Vfm Holding Co A Trust | Victoria, KS 67671 | $44,670 |
108 | Bittel Farms | Ellis, KS 67637 | $44,206 |
109 | Western Star Ag Resources Inc | Salina, KS 67402 | $43,704 |
110 | Donald Ralph Chrisler | Gorham, KS 67640 | $43,667 |
111 | Ivan Gottschalk | Hays, KS 67601 | $43,451 |
112 | Gary Haas | Ellis, KS 67637 | $43,191 |
113 | H & R Vonlintel Rev Tr No 1 | Victoria, KS 67671 | $42,959 |
114 | Timothy M Schmidtberger | Victoria, KS 67671 | $42,837 |
115 | Edmund & Albina Befort Rev Trust | Hays, KS 67601 | $42,782 |
116 | Tom R Barnes | Hays, KS 67601 | $42,685 |
117 | Norbert K Leiker | Schoenchen, KS 67667 | $42,482 |
118 | Robert J Braun | Hays, KS 67601 | $42,480 |
119 | Clement J Karlin | Hays, KS 67601 | $42,430 |
120 | Julius A Legleiter | Hays, KS 67601 | $42,402 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”