Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Finney County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 992
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Finney County, Kansas totaled $4,169 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Strasser Revocable Family Trust | Garden City, KS 67846 | $122 |
102 | Powell Angus Ranch Inc | Kalvesta, KS 67835 | $120 |
103 | Mcgraw Inc | Garden City, KS 67868 | $119 |
104 | O'brate Brothers Inc | Holcomb, KS 67851 | $117 |
105 | Dennis & Karen Zerr Joint Venture | Garden City, KS 67846 | $116 |
106 | Jean M Larson | Garden City, KS 67846 | $116 |
107 | Emanuel Doll | Garden City, KS 67846 | $116 |
108 | Katherine W Cook Irr Tr | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $115 |
109 | Richmeier Farms Partnership | Garden City, KS 67846 | $115 |
110 | Rapp & Reed Farm Partnership | Garden City, KS 67846 | $112 |
111 | Mayo Sexton Land & Cattle | Garden City, KS 67846 | $111 |
112 | J L M Farms Ptshp | Pratt, KS 67124 | $109 |
113 | Rome Brothers Inc | Holcomb, KS 67851 | $109 |
114 | Irsik & Doll Feed Services Inc | Garden City, KS 67846 | $108 |
115 | Harold E Mai | Garden City, KS 67846 | $107 |
116 | Andrew Charles Holsted | Garden City, KS 67846 | $106 |
117 | J & J Land & Cattle Inc | Sarasota, FL 34232 | $106 |
118 | Donald R Knoll | Deerfield, KS 67838 | $104 |
119 | Frank W Daykin | Lincoln, NE 68501 | $103 |
120 | Robert Drees Revocable Trust | Garden City, KS 67846 | $102 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”