Deficiency Payment in Finney County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,371
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Finney County, Kansas totaled $3,654,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kleysteuber & Gillen Inc | Garden City, KS 67846 | $20,326 |
22 | Ramsey Brothers Partnership | Garden City, KS 67846 | $19,844 |
23 | Leo Kleysteuber | Garden City, KS 67846 | $19,343 |
24 | Dechant Bros Partnership | Garden City, KS 67846 | $18,528 |
25 | Merle R Blood | Garden City, KS 67846 | $18,496 |
26 | D Lightner Farms Inc | Garden City, KS 67868 | $18,376 |
27 | Eldon Alexander Dba Sandhill Rnch | Garden City, KS 67846 | $18,376 |
28 | Rodger Funk Farms Inc | Garden City, KS 67846 | $17,999 |
29 | Richard A Webdell | Garden City, KS 67846 | $17,958 |
30 | Greg Boyd Farms Partnership | Garden City, KS 67846 | $17,920 |
31 | Rmr Farms Inc | Garden City, KS 67846 | $17,876 |
32 | Linville Farms Partnership | Shawnee, KS 66216 | $17,876 |
33 | Isaac Properties Inc | Peoria, AZ 85383 | $17,734 |
34 | Clayton L Unruh | Copeland, KS 67837 | $17,593 |
35 | Gerald Lightner | Garden City, KS 67868 | $17,560 |
36 | Phillip Duesing | Garden City, KS 67846 | $17,385 |
37 | Stone Acres Inc | Garden City, KS 67846 | $17,300 |
38 | Kyle Lightner | Garden City, KS 67846 | $16,734 |
39 | Mayo Sexton Land & Cattle | Garden City, KS 67846 | $16,640 |
40 | Sbk Inc | Garden City, KS 67846 | $16,134 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”