Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Ford County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 157
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Ford County, Kansas totaled $1,126,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ellis Land & Cattle Co Inc | Kingsdown, KS 67842 | $5,558 |
62 | Carl L Birney | Bucklin, KS 67834 | $5,519 |
63 | Rosa Lee Raney | Hoxie, KS 67740 | $5,480 |
64 | Judith K Porsch | Bucklin, KS 67834 | $5,480 |
65 | Bonnie B Wakefield | Commerce City, CO 80022 | $5,480 |
66 | Ruth Baskett | Offerle, KS 67563 | $5,269 |
67 | Steven - & Denise Riegel Rev Trust | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $5,152 |
68 | Marie R Doll | Wright, KS 67882 | $4,974 |
69 | Delphine Peintner Tr | Spearville, KS 67876 | $4,865 |
70 | Ruth Davis Revocable Trust | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $4,859 |
71 | Dorothy Weber | Ford, KS 67842 | $4,849 |
72 | Gerald & Virginia Herrman Trust | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $4,736 |
73 | Norton E Askew | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $4,564 |
74 | Earnest Demuth | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $4,484 |
75 | Karen K Matthews | Manhattan, KS 66503 | $4,479 |
76 | Janice C Schwier | Coweta, OK 74429 | $4,275 |
77 | Douglas Wayne Melia | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $4,248 |
78 | Paula Mcmanaman | Fowler, KS 67844 | $4,140 |
79 | Kevin Imel | Kingsdown, KS 67842 | $4,080 |
80 | Patricia Condon Heup | The Woodlands, TX 77382 | $4,030 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”