Conservation Reserve Program in Ford County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 325
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Ford County, Kansas totaled $1,151,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Nyle E Salmans | Mc Louth, KS 66054 | $3,139 |
102 | Pamela A Munoz | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $3,075 |
103 | Basgall Investment Tr | Roeland Park, KS 66205 | $2,988 |
104 | Schmitt Family LLC | Hobbs, NM 88241 | $2,985 |
105 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $2,973 |
106 | Mike Redfield | Kingston, WA 98346 | $2,968 |
107 | Rick L Konecny Trust | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $2,931 |
108 | Roger Stimpert Farming Inc | Kingsdown, KS 67842 | $2,877 |
109 | Kent Bartlett | Fowler, KS 67844 | $2,856 |
110 | Etling Farms | Ensign, KS 67841 | $2,752 |
111 | Bill Claussen | Spearville, KS 67876 | $2,721 |
112 | Charles D Imel | Kingsdown, KS 67842 | $2,697 |
113 | Marie Waters | Ellinwood, KS 67526 | $2,644 |
114 | Linda M - & Larry D Martin Living Trust Martin | Ford, KS 67842 | $2,642 |
115 | Kelly W Mcdowell | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $2,632 |
116 | Brandie Ferguson | Ensign, KS 67841 | $2,632 |
117 | Edward Lee Spencer Jr | Oklahoma City, OK 73120 | $2,568 |
118 | Double Z Farms LLC | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $2,488 |
119 | Taylor Droste Trust | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $2,452 |
120 | Demuth Ventures LLC | Ford, KS 67842 | $2,448 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”