Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program in Ford County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 193
Recipients of Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program from farms in Ford County, Kansas totaled $323,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Robert Issinghoff Family Trust | Spearville, KS 67876 | $280 |
142 | Schneweis Farms Inc | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $271 |
143 | Spohr Farms | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $267 |
144 | George D Schulte | Spearville, KS 67876 | $250 |
145 | Calvin Copeland | Kingsdown, KS 67842 | $248 |
146 | Valie Patterson Robbins | Lees Summit, MO 64086 | $243 |
147 | Lowell J Wagner | Offerle, KS 67563 | $241 |
148 | Josephine - Lix Revo L Lix | Wright, KS 67882 | $236 |
149 | Alice J Rausch | Alpharetta, GA 30009 | $232 |
150 | Dale Von Trebra | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $224 |
151 | Quentin A Doll | Wichita, KS 67204 | $215 |
152 | Richard E Torline | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $212 |
153 | Ann Stegman | Orlando, FL 32806 | $211 |
154 | Roger Stimpert Farming Inc | Kingsdown, KS 67842 | $209 |
155 | Evelyn Klepper | Ellinwood, KS 67526 | $207 |
156 | Evelyn Steimel | Wright, KS 67882 | $206 |
157 | Orville V Brehm | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $203 |
158 | Frank H Buehne Trust | Spearville, KS 67876 | $198 |
159 | Clarrisa E Cannon Testmentary Tru | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $192 |
160 | Tom Feist | Spearville, KS 67876 | $183 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”