Conservation Reserve Program in Ford County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,572
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Ford County, Kansas totaled $60,057,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | James R Spradlin | Gainesville, GA 30506 | $256,129 |
42 | Vicki R Wheeler | Shawnee, KS 66217 | $255,937 |
43 | Robert A Steele | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $254,959 |
44 | 600 Club Inc | Spearville, KS 67876 | $252,159 |
45 | John & Phyllis Indiek Trust | Spearville, KS 67876 | $251,738 |
46 | Jewell A Perkins Rev Trst | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $250,707 |
47 | Gary H Bell | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $247,647 |
48 | R F Keough | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $246,647 |
49 | Lelia M Roberts | Olathe, KS 66051 | $240,238 |
50 | Steve Dasenbrock | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $237,798 |
51 | Sanko Farms | Spearville, KS 67876 | $234,017 |
52 | Allen Farms Inc | Hays, KS 67601 | $233,048 |
53 | Leland And Margaret Johnson Rev T | Longview, TX 75605 | $227,678 |
54 | James R Imel | Spearville, KS 67876 | $227,152 |
55 | Donald E Miller | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $226,389 |
56 | Richard Slattery | Tulsa, OK 74114 | $225,629 |
57 | Duane Askew | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $224,236 |
58 | George D Schulte | Spearville, KS 67876 | $221,278 |
59 | Glenn Helfrich | Spearville, KS 67876 | $216,386 |
60 | Kenneth Erickson | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $215,264 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”