Deficiency Payment in Geary County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 326
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Geary County, Kansas totaled $244,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Kathleen F Acker Revocable Living | Superior, NE 68978 | $653 |
102 | Beth Louise Miller Rev Intervivos | Superior, NE 68978 | $653 |
103 | Greg Shandy | Milford, KS 66514 | $650 |
104 | The Gladys M Dietrich Trust | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $642 |
105 | Mark D Roeser | Junction City, KS 66441 | $622 |
106 | Gaylord Munson | Junction City, KS 66441 | $609 |
107 | Alvin Lay | Alta Vista, KS 66834 | $608 |
108 | Edwin F Adams | Junction City, KS 66441 | $602 |
109 | James- James And Shi L Ferguson | Junction City, KS 66441 | $597 |
110 | Guy Fredrick Hanney Rev Trust | Junction City, KS 66441 | $592 |
111 | Eileen J Keller | Chapman, KS 67431 | $591 |
112 | Willard Hannagan | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $587 |
113 | Harold Boller | Junction City, KS 66441 | $580 |
114 | William J Taylor | Junction City, KS 66441 | $570 |
115 | John W Collins | Junction City, KS 66441 | $556 |
116 | Blandina Strauss | Junction City, KS 66441 | $517 |
117 | David L Wetzel | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $507 |
118 | Rhoda Schirmer | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $507 |
119 | Virginia M Waters | Junction City, KS 66441 | $503 |
120 | John Bischoff | Chapman, KS 67431 | $498 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”