Deficiency Payment in Geary County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 326
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Geary County, Kansas totaled $244,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | John F Clark | Alta Vista, KS 66834 | $495 |
122 | Ed Junghans | Junction City, KS 66441 | $493 |
123 | Robert Goss | Dwight, KS 66849 | $490 |
124 | Fred C Germann Revocable Interviv | Junction City, KS 66441 | $490 |
125 | Robert And Philip Janke | Junction City, KS 66441 | $486 |
126 | Clarence Wuethrich | Chapman, KS 67431 | $475 |
127 | Richard H Ziegler Trust | Junction City, KS 66441 | $473 |
128 | Brian Scott Johnston | Junction City, KS 66441 | $451 |
129 | C A Zumbrunn | Junction City, KS 66441 | $450 |
130 | Milton Ruhnke | Junction City, KS 66441 | $429 |
131 | Mildred Schad | Junction City, KS 66441 | $426 |
132 | Esther Errebo | Salina, KS 67401 | $411 |
133 | Larry Hanney | Junction City, KS 66441 | $405 |
134 | Laurence J Hoover | Junction City, KS 66441 | $400 |
135 | Wm E Garvin | Los Altos, CA 94022 | $397 |
136 | R W Kirkpatrick | Little River Academy, TX 76554 | $386 |
137 | John C Oesterreich | Junction City, KS 66441 | $383 |
138 | Phyllis Kotoyantz | Junction City, KS 66441 | $378 |
139 | Harry Fiest | Topeka, KS 66617 | $360 |
140 | Betty V Mader Revocable Trust | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $359 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”