Total Conservation Programs in Geary County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 306
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Geary County, Kansas totaled $4,377,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Henry C Hartung Jr | Junction City, KS 66441 | $8,542 |
122 | Ronald L Cook | Alta Vista, KS 66834 | $8,116 |
123 | Virginia F Platt | Junction City, KS 66441 | $8,084 |
124 | Irene Joyce Heideman Revocable Tr | Alta Vista, KS 66834 | $8,044 |
125 | Ronald Dean Strauss Trust | Junction City, KS 66441 | $8,019 |
126 | R W Kirkpatrick | Little River Academy, TX 76554 | $7,955 |
127 | Raymond Fiest | Junction City, KS 66441 | $7,910 |
128 | James R Paul | Junction City, KS 66441 | $7,533 |
129 | Flossie Rosey | Lindsborg, KS 67456 | $7,415 |
130 | Don E Bieling | Dwight, KS 66849 | $7,256 |
131 | John E Garanson Rev Trust | Dwight, KS 66849 | $7,126 |
132 | Eric A Altwegg | Abilene, KS 67410 | $6,708 |
133 | Bruce V Johnson | Junction City, KS 66441 | $6,044 |
134 | Lucille Amthauer Estate | Hutchinson, KS 67501 | $6,033 |
135 | Maxine O Caley Trust | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $5,972 |
136 | Homer K Caley Trust | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $5,972 |
137 | Lisa L Lee | Saint George, KS 66535 | $5,702 |
138 | Gary L Hall | Chapman, KS 67431 | $5,534 |
139 | Gary Luttman | Wakefield, KS 67487 | $5,528 |
140 | Roger L Crowell | Mcpherson, KS 67460 | $5,476 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”