Conservation Reserve Program in Geary County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 272
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Geary County, Kansas totaled $4,003,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Michael D Marston | Wakefield, KS 67487 | $3,137 |
162 | Shane C Marston | Merriam, KS 66203 | $3,136 |
163 | Joan E Zoschke Trust | Junction City, KS 66441 | $3,053 |
164 | Lillian Bragg | Junction City, KS 66441 | $2,976 |
165 | Rodney R Ratts | Junction City, KS 66441 | $2,851 |
166 | John D Blanken | Henderson, NV 89014 | $2,797 |
167 | Kim L Manz | Lawrence, KS 66044 | $2,704 |
168 | Kari L M Garcia | Los Alamos, NM 87544 | $2,699 |
169 | Patsy C Moyer | Junction City, KS 66441 | $2,696 |
170 | Joseph A And Elizabeth Ryan Mitch | Junction City, KS 66441 | $2,599 |
171 | Billy K Richardson | Junction City, KS 66441 | $2,568 |
172 | Dean R Blanken | Fort Detrick, MD 21702 | $2,546 |
173 | Richard Scott Miller | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $2,446 |
174 | Howard Miller | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $2,402 |
175 | Dennis Boller | Junction City, KS 66441 | $2,400 |
176 | Verna C Schmedemann | Bryan, TX 77802 | $2,368 |
177 | Guy Fredrick Hanney Rev Trust | Junction City, KS 66441 | $2,354 |
178 | Martin Roeser Trust | Junction City, KS 66441 | $2,347 |
179 | Michael C Harris Revocable Living Trust | Milford, KS 66514 | $2,333 |
180 | Maxine L Adams | Junction City, KS 66441 | $2,277 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”