Farm Subsidy information
Geary County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Geary County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 984
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Geary County, Kansas totaled $48,504,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | Stanley Ascher Trust | Alta Vista, KS 66834 | $143,199 |
| 62 | Marjorie- The Marjor Wahle | Junction City, KS 66441 | $140,733 |
| 63 | Fred C Germann Revocable Interviv | Junction City, KS 66441 | $136,400 |
| 64 | Alan R Clark Trust | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $133,518 |
| 65 | Ronald W Gfeller | Junction City, KS 66441 | $131,084 |
| 66 | Richard L Gustafson | Junction City, KS 66441 | $129,132 |
| 67 | Duane Gugler | Manhattan, KS 66505 | $127,041 |
| 68 | James Wahle | Junction City, KS 66441 | $126,296 |
| 69 | Merle M Ascher | Junction City, KS 66441 | $125,053 |
| 70 | Munson Angus Farms LLC | Junction City, KS 66441 | $123,424 |
| 71 | Clark's Creek, LLC | Junction City, KS 66441 | $120,827 |
| 72 | Janice L Erichsen | Junction City, KS 66441 | $116,360 |
| 73 | Justin D Roeser | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $113,375 |
| 74 | Merle M And Betty A Ascher Living Trust | Junction City, KS 66441 | $112,212 |
| 75 | Gary Lee Schellhorn Rev Trust | White City, KS 66872 | $111,878 |
| 76 | John A Kummer Jr Trust | Chapman, KS 67431 | $110,893 |
| 77 | Jahnke Samuel R & Sons | Junction City, KS 66441 | $107,238 |
| 78 | Erichsen Harvesting LLC | Junction City, KS 66441 | $107,232 |
| 79 | Lyon Creek Hay Co Inc | Junction City, KS 66441 | $103,946 |
| 80 | Jack L Swenson | Junction City, KS 66441 | $101,025 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf