Counter Cyclical Program in Geary County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 366
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Geary County, Kansas totaled $585,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Munson Angus Farm | Junction City, KS 66441 | $6,147 |
22 | Michael W Gfeller | Junction City, KS 66441 | $5,732 |
23 | Charles E Munson Trust | Junction City, KS 66441 | $5,636 |
24 | Jahnke Samuel R & Sons | Junction City, KS 66441 | $5,580 |
25 | Billy L Brown Revocable Trust | Dwight, KS 66849 | $5,527 |
26 | Gary Shandy | Milford, KS 66514 | $5,468 |
27 | Lee Taylor | Junction City, KS 66441 | $5,270 |
28 | Bar-box Ranch Inc | Alta Vista, KS 66834 | $5,160 |
29 | Fred C Germann Revocable Interviv | Junction City, KS 66441 | $5,115 |
30 | G Richard Munson Revocable Intervivos Trust Indent | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $5,043 |
31 | Roger A Brown | Alta Vista, KS 66834 | $4,980 |
32 | Philip D Janke | Junction City, KS 66441 | $4,833 |
33 | James J Waters | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $4,715 |
34 | Poland Farms Inc | Junction City, KS 66441 | $4,694 |
35 | Gregory J Brown | Alta Vista, KS 66834 | $4,524 |
36 | Stanley Ascher Trust | Alta Vista, KS 66834 | $4,231 |
37 | Jim C Patterson | Dwight, KS 66849 | $3,976 |
38 | Eldon W Steinfort | Junction City, KS 66441 | $3,948 |
39 | Poland Brothers LLC | Junction City, KS 66441 | $3,772 |
40 | Henry W Roeser Trust | Woodland, CA 95695 | $3,627 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”