Conservation Reserve Program in Gove County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 677
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Gove County, Kansas totaled $31,477,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Mark S Coberly | Gove, KS 67736 | $37,160 |
182 | Scheetz Revocable Trust - Dennis Scheetz | Monument, KS 67747 | $36,996 |
183 | Albert Zavala | Rosemount, MN 55068 | $36,708 |
184 | Loretta Blackwill Family LLC | Quinter, KS 67752 | $36,699 |
185 | Gary Rose | Celina, OH 45822 | $36,552 |
186 | Timothy Werth | Quinter, KS 67752 | $36,050 |
187 | Keith Clark Work | Sacramento, CA 95864 | $36,049 |
188 | James B Work | Steilacoom, WA 98388 | $36,038 |
189 | Carolyn Ann Zerr | Quinter, KS 67752 | $35,403 |
190 | Kathryn Fossett | Quinter, KS 67752 | $35,329 |
191 | Trula S Davis | Dighton, KS 67839 | $35,316 |
192 | Roy Thornburg | Utica, KS 67584 | $34,657 |
193 | Anna Selenke | Oakley, KS 67748 | $34,029 |
194 | Clodfelter Families Rev Trust | Port Townsend, WA 98368 | $33,590 |
195 | Justin M Polifka | Quinter, KS 67752 | $32,985 |
196 | Twt Farms LLC | Gove, KS 67736 | $32,905 |
197 | Mahlon A Tuttle | Quinter, KS 67752 | $32,568 |
198 | Diane D Townsend Horner Rev Trust | Windsor, CO 80550 | $32,244 |
199 | Delbert E Babcock | Utica, KS 67584 | $32,047 |
200 | Cecil L Inman Living Rev Tr | Thomas, OK 73669 | $32,034 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”