Farm Subsidy information
Graham County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Graham County, Kansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 677
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Graham County, Kansas totaled $16,029,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Irl Troy Brassfield | Bogue, KS 67625 | $42,558 |
42 | John V Riedel Living Trust | Morland, KS 67650 | $40,591 |
43 | L & A Johnson Farms LLC | Bogue, KS 67625 | $40,229 |
44 | Karen Pelton | Zurich, KS 67663 | $39,335 |
45 | Paul Brassfield Foundation Inc | Hill City, KS 67642 | $38,320 |
46 | Hickert Farm Inc | Grain Valley, MO 64029 | $37,745 |
47 | Lonnie C Beckman | Lenora, KS 67645 | $37,013 |
48 | Walt Farms Inc | Quinter, KS 67752 | $36,967 |
49 | Anthony J Herman | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $36,603 |
50 | Brent L Voss | Hill City, KS 67642 | $35,150 |
51 | Andrea Haffner | Hoxie, KS 67740 | $34,503 |
52 | Tim Benoit | Damar, KS 67632 | $33,636 |
53 | Daniel E Mcamoil | Penokee, KS 67659 | $33,546 |
54 | Galen Geyer | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $33,117 |
55 | Vincent P Hofstetter | Hill City, KS 67642 | $32,808 |
56 | Iva Beckman Revocable Trust | Hill City, KS 67642 | $32,651 |
57 | Karmen Davignon | Hill City, KS 67642 | $31,775 |
58 | Daniel Lynn Knipp | Damar, KS 67632 | $31,635 |
59 | Francis J Knipp | Damar, KS 67632 | $31,603 |
60 | Kent M Tien | Prairie View, KS 67664 | $31,344 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”