Conservation Reserve Program in Graham County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,549
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Graham County, Kansas totaled $53,818,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Chenoweth Farms & Land LLC | Frederick, CO 80516 | $236,251 |
42 | Griffith Farms | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $228,725 |
43 | Elden Ambrosier | Norton, KS 67654 | $225,975 |
44 | Galen Barnett | Parkville, MO 64152 | $225,494 |
45 | Neil Barnett | Hill City, KS 67642 | $220,992 |
46 | Eileen K Parks | Ellis, KS 67637 | $216,918 |
47 | Lew Ninemire | Hill City, KS 67642 | $213,810 |
48 | Elizabeth Vanloenen | Bogue, KS 67625 | $208,196 |
49 | Linda S Zohner | Lawrence, KS 66044 | $208,164 |
50 | Toomay Rev Liv Trust Wesley E & A | Gravois Mills, MO 65037 | $207,966 |
51 | Colleen Couey | Hill City, KS 67642 | $207,225 |
52 | Ted J Nighswonger Trust | Lenora, KS 67645 | $207,154 |
53 | Rock Creek Farms Inc | Hill City, KS 67642 | $203,767 |
54 | David Faulkner | Ogallah, KS 67656 | $199,671 |
55 | Helen Marguerite Morris Irr Tr | Hill City, KS 67642 | $196,407 |
56 | Logan Keith | Morland, KS 67650 | $193,930 |
57 | Gano Farms Inc %g Gano | Hill City, KS 67642 | $188,340 |
58 | White Jean M Rev Living Trust | Norton, KS 67654 | $187,335 |
59 | Derwin A Worcester | Lucas, KS 67648 | $186,148 |
60 | Lamoyne Jackson | Hill City, KS 67642 | $185,088 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”