Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Graham County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 425
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Graham County, Kansas totaled $7,678,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Gregory J Hamel | Damar, KS 67632 | $21,318 |
102 | Curtis Worcester | Hill City, KS 67642 | $20,620 |
103 | Mark L Voss | Logan, KS 67646 | $20,548 |
104 | Daniel Lynn Knipp | Damar, KS 67632 | $20,289 |
105 | Tate J Tremblay | Penokee, KS 67659 | $20,136 |
106 | Larry D Worcester | Hill City, KS 67642 | $20,015 |
107 | Eugene L Desair | Damar, KS 67632 | $19,403 |
108 | Jason J Davis | Hill City, KS 67642 | $19,286 |
109 | Arik James Davis | Hill City, KS 67642 | $19,219 |
110 | Aaron Matthew Davis | Hill City, KS 67642 | $19,219 |
111 | Diana R Nickelson Living Trust | Penokee, KS 67659 | $19,026 |
112 | David Bieker | Lakewood, CO 80228 | $18,975 |
113 | Francis J Knipp | Damar, KS 67632 | $18,974 |
114 | Brent L Voss | Hill City, KS 67642 | $18,739 |
115 | Brungardt Land & Cattle LLC | Blue Springs, MO 64015 | $18,713 |
116 | Michael S Hart | Bogue, KS 67625 | $18,707 |
117 | Graham County Leasing Inc | Hill City, KS 67642 | $18,429 |
118 | Christopher Riedel | Hill City, KS 67642 | $18,288 |
119 | Leon Stephen Trust | Bogue, KS 67625 | $18,271 |
120 | Dale Toll | Morland, KS 67650 | $18,249 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”