Conservation Reserve Program in Graham County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,549
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Graham County, Kansas totaled $53,818,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Irl And Ruth Brassfield Trust | Bogue, KS 67625 | $1,018,995 |
2 | Merlyn Worcester | Hill City, KS 67642 | $872,544 |
3 | Pfeifer Living Trust | Hays, KS 67601 | $738,237 |
4 | Brassfield Bros Inc | Bogue, KS 67625 | $538,106 |
5 | James H Popp | Quinter, KS 67752 | $529,079 |
6 | Gary L Parks | Ellis, KS 67637 | $447,130 |
7 | Roy Van Loenen | Bogue, KS 67625 | $423,115 |
8 | Irl Troy Brassfield | Bogue, KS 67625 | $415,405 |
9 | Josie Worcester | Hill City, KS 67642 | $405,013 |
10 | Edward H Stehno Rev Liv Tr | Hays, KS 67601 | $397,534 |
11 | Dane G Hansen Foundation | Hutchinson, KS 67504 | $380,916 |
12 | Stanley Brandyberry- Brandyberry Rev Trust | Hill City, KS 67642 | $374,218 |
13 | Hickert Farm Inc | Grain Valley, MO 64029 | $368,901 |
14 | Bernice Fountain | Hill City, KS 67642 | $359,485 |
15 | Jane Zohner Brown | Penokee, KS 67659 | $350,888 |
16 | Dwayne Hardman | Hill City, KS 67642 | $346,763 |
17 | Brad Trexler | Hill City, KS 67642 | $340,072 |
18 | John A Griffith | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $328,255 |
19 | Paul E Brassfield Dvm | Hill City, KS 67642 | $326,778 |
20 | Stehno Farms LLC | Hays, KS 67601 | $321,177 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>