Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program in Gray County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 275
Recipients of Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program from farms in Gray County, Kansas totaled $465,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Michelle J Leatherwood | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $769 |
122 | Carl S Leatherwood | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $769 |
123 | J B Glassco LLC | Lago Vista, TX 78645 | $765 |
124 | Suzanne Busch Trust | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $744 |
125 | Howard Schmidt | Montezuma, KS 67867 | $742 |
126 | Lavern R Koehn | Copeland, KS 67837 | $739 |
127 | Craig B Koehn | Montezuma, KS 67867 | $683 |
128 | John R & Lillian J Koehn Rev Tr | Montezuma, KS 67867 | $663 |
129 | John B Haviland | Junction City, KS 66441 | $662 |
130 | Linda S Dirks | Ulysses, KS 67880 | $648 |
131 | Eldon L Dirks | Ulysses, KS 67880 | $648 |
132 | Antoinette Hann | Hanston, KS 67849 | $645 |
133 | Francis J Clancy Jr | Copeland, KS 67837 | $645 |
134 | Paul Eugene Clancy | Copeland, KS 67837 | $645 |
135 | Carolda Edwards - Steve And Carolda Edwards Trust | Fowler, KS 67844 | $636 |
136 | David Lee Loucks | Apache Junction, AZ 85120 | $632 |
137 | Betty Volmert | Wichita, KS 67212 | $624 |
138 | William - Bidleman R J Bidleman | Kinsley, KS 67547 | $612 |
139 | Mcfarland And Son | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $602 |
140 | Mildred Le Crump Rev Tr | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $599 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”