Total Commodity Programs in Gray County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,046
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Gray County, Kansas totaled $363,456,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Clarence Irsik Jr | Ingalls, KS 67853 | $1,632,766 |
22 | Kopper Family Farms | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $1,568,935 |
23 | M-6 Farms Inc | Ingalls, KS 67853 | $1,560,677 |
24 | Etling Farms | Ensign, KS 67841 | $1,542,005 |
25 | Spanier Bros | Copeland, KS 67837 | $1,521,414 |
26 | Trajan Farms Inc | Copeland, KS 67837 | $1,509,037 |
27 | R & P Farm | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $1,479,267 |
28 | Michelle Frink LLC | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $1,423,460 |
29 | Bradley Irsik | Ingalls, KS 67853 | $1,422,504 |
30 | Lonnie Ray Schmidt | Montezuma, KS 67867 | $1,399,524 |
31 | Carl S Leatherwood | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $1,397,812 |
32 | Tom Miller | Ingalls, KS 67853 | $1,392,617 |
33 | Donald D Koehn II | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $1,375,001 |
34 | Daniel & Kathleen Miller Revocable Trust | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $1,374,340 |
35 | Steve Kliewer | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $1,360,321 |
36 | Koehn Farms Inc | Montezuma, KS 67867 | $1,341,156 |
37 | Clancy & Sons | Copeland, KS 67837 | $1,331,891 |
38 | J & S Inc | Montezuma, KS 67867 | $1,324,866 |
39 | Tom Wehkamp | Garden City, KS 67846 | $1,317,649 |
40 | Ross Koehn | Montezuma, KS 67867 | $1,308,488 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”