Total Conservation Programs in Greeley County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 173
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Greeley County, Kansas totaled $988,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Melodie Rauch Tr | Amarillo, TX 79124 | $5,957 |
42 | Jackson E Ozment | Tribune, KS 67879 | $5,955 |
43 | Kathryn Robinson | Geary, OK 73040 | $5,913 |
44 | Preston Allen Smith | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $5,831 |
45 | James H Riggs | Westminster, CO 80021 | $5,585 |
46 | Kathryn M Contreraz | West Jordan, UT 84084 | $5,585 |
47 | Duane N Schneider | Tribune, KS 67879 | $5,549 |
48 | Benjamin Fisher | Tribune, KS 67879 | $5,479 |
49 | L D Houston | Tribune, KS 67879 | $5,421 |
50 | Duane Willsey | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $5,372 |
51 | The Hampton Family Liv Tr | Gardner, KS 66030 | $5,291 |
52 | Richard & Deresa Hampton Rev Tr | Independence, MO 64057 | $5,291 |
53 | Kathryn A Nuss | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $5,170 |
54 | Allen Phillips - Allen Phillips And Denise Phillip | Tribune, KS 67879 | $5,118 |
55 | Barry B Bounds | Highlands Ranch, CO 80126 | $5,114 |
56 | Petriello Revocable Trust | Seattle, WA 98119 | $5,076 |
57 | William W Byerly Rev Tr | Tribune, KS 67879 | $4,996 |
58 | Mark Foltz | Humphrey, NE 68642 | $4,955 |
59 | Roger A Studer | Denver, CO 80230 | $4,932 |
60 | David Tarman | Tribune, KS 67879 | $4,892 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”