Conservation Reserve Program in Greeley County, Kansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 150
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Greeley County, Kansas totaled $932,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Kyle W Shafer | Tribune, KS 67879 | $2,712 |
82 | Nick Bradford Smith | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $2,633 |
83 | Lindy Ray Smith | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $2,633 |
84 | Alicia Nicole Allen | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $2,633 |
85 | Janine K Baehler | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $2,608 |
86 | Virginia L Johnson | Tribune, KS 67879 | $2,608 |
87 | Rodney J Mueller | Boulder, CO 80301 | $2,567 |
88 | Jackie M Hutchins Rev Tr | Tribune, KS 67879 | $2,536 |
89 | Hutchins Family Mrtl Tr | Tribune, KS 67879 | $2,536 |
90 | Karen Kaufman | Moundridge, KS 67107 | $2,448 |
91 | Mary Ann Boschmann | North Newton, KS 67117 | $2,286 |
92 | Tammy Praven | Geneva, IL 60134 | $2,157 |
93 | Dale H Robinson | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $2,146 |
94 | Steven Lobmeyer - Steven N Lobmeyer Rev Trust | Coaldale, CO 81222 | $2,127 |
95 | Jenifer Nemechek | Garden City, KS 67846 | $2,113 |
96 | Sunflower Prairie Farms LLC | Tribune, KS 67879 | $2,078 |
97 | Arthur N Kohn | Erie, CO 80516 | $2,057 |
98 | Dolores V Sands | Texas City, TX 77591 | $2,026 |
99 | Jeffrey P Nolan | Tribune, KS 67879 | $1,944 |
100 | Michael J Govert | Tribune, KS 67879 | $1,942 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”