Conservation Reserve Program in Hamilton County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 442
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Hamilton County, Kansas totaled $3,586,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Douglas Guldner - Guldner Trust | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $29,335 |
22 | Farm Credit Of Ness City ** | Ness City, KS 67560 | $28,041 |
23 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $27,744 |
24 | James P Barrett | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $27,092 |
25 | Fence Post LLC | Denver, CO 80216 | $26,614 |
26 | First National Bank Of Syracuse ** | Johnson, KS 67855 | $26,550 |
27 | John Simon | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $25,624 |
28 | Bernice Dunn | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $25,551 |
29 | John E Chisholm | Overland Park, KS 66221 | $25,511 |
30 | Carolyn S Morton | Houston, TX 77070 | $24,607 |
31 | Djj Farms Inc | Overland Park, KS 66215 | $24,194 |
32 | Jack M Owen Sr Trust No 1 | Argonia, KS 67004 | $23,388 |
33 | Clariece Kohlhorst | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $23,029 |
34 | Central Sand Inc | Wichita, KS 67205 | $22,830 |
35 | Forrest H Nelson Trust | Alva, OK 73717 | $22,252 |
36 | Keith Puckett | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $21,884 |
37 | Linda Puckett | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $21,704 |
38 | Curtis Wright | Holly, CO 81047 | $21,638 |
39 | Eaton Associates | Jay Em, WY 82219 | $21,461 |
40 | Daren Wagner | Holly, CO 81047 | $21,128 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”