Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Hamilton County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 447
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Hamilton County, Kansas totaled $12,247,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Kenneth Martin Irr Trust | Greeley, CO 80631 | $21,479 |
122 | Teresa Kohman | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $21,294 |
123 | Dora Grilliot Rev Trust | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $21,210 |
124 | Wilcox Family Trust | Crystal Bay, NV 89402 | $20,711 |
125 | Douglas H Westeman | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $20,341 |
126 | Nancy A Grilliot Trust | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $20,205 |
127 | Derrick Anthony Hatcher | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $20,140 |
128 | Janice Simon | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $20,043 |
129 | Norah Constance Chamberlain | Lincoln, NE 68528 | $19,383 |
130 | Zeno Gould Irr Trust | Centennial, CO 80112 | $19,222 |
131 | Helen E Burnett | Louisville, CO 80027 | $19,098 |
132 | Keller Klan LLC | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $19,024 |
133 | Bart Hatcher | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $18,896 |
134 | Ruth A Burton Family Trust | Olathe, KS 66061 | $18,865 |
135 | Brownlee Brothers Land & Cattle | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $18,591 |
136 | Darrin S Simon | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $18,558 |
137 | John C Burton Irr Trust | Olathe, KS 66061 | $18,535 |
138 | Dan Buck | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $17,850 |
139 | Kelly Johnson | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $17,797 |
140 | Vince Huser | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $17,754 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”