Production Flexibility Program in Harper County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,113
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Harper County, Kansas totaled $37,669,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Sunny Slope Farms Inc | Kiowa, KS 67070 | $111,117 |
82 | Francis G Drouhard | Danville, KS 67036 | $109,282 |
83 | Ronald D Loesch | Attica, KS 67009 | $107,295 |
84 | Max Murrow | Bluff City, KS 67018 | $107,021 |
85 | Jack C Gates | Anthony, KS 67003 | $102,025 |
86 | Hunter Johnson Farms Inc | Harper, KS 67058 | $101,603 |
87 | Randal Blanchat | Danville, KS 67036 | $101,336 |
88 | Allen R Francis | Anthony, KS 67003 | $101,312 |
89 | Ivan L Koblitz | Hazelton, KS 67061 | $100,960 |
90 | Richard W Watt Trust-richard W Wa | Harper, KS 67058 | $100,531 |
91 | Jerry Podschun | Anthony, KS 67003 | $98,339 |
92 | Loren V Ingram | Baldwin City, KS 66006 | $98,081 |
93 | Dwight Hoopes | Anthony, KS 67003 | $97,036 |
94 | Danny Moore | Anthony, KS 67003 | $96,667 |
95 | Mark S Mccoy And Patsy F Mccoy Rev Tr | Argonia, KS 67004 | $95,146 |
96 | Dennis W Francis | Anthony, KS 67003 | $94,997 |
97 | Jerry Miller | Harper, KS 67058 | $94,252 |
98 | M & S Francis Farms Inc | Anthony, KS 67003 | $92,378 |
99 | Samuel P Drouhard | Harper, KS 67058 | $91,521 |
100 | Wayne M Drouhard | Harper, KS 67058 | $91,505 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”