Total Conservation Programs in Harper County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,069
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Harper County, Kansas totaled $28,770,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Marcia Miller | Halstead, KS 67056 | $71,707 |
102 | R E K & C General Coast Management Information Co | Riverside, CA 92507 | $71,622 |
103 | The Charles S Wood And Eleanor Jo | Anthony, KS 67003 | $71,337 |
104 | A E Shroyer Jr | Bella Vista, AR 72714 | $71,234 |
105 | Gary L Shroyer | Sterling, KS 67579 | $71,234 |
106 | Wayne Kiser | Attica, KS 67009 | $71,229 |
107 | Ronald D Loesch | Attica, KS 67009 | $71,091 |
108 | Edna Jones | Attica, KS 67009 | $70,884 |
109 | Synda L Kitts Trust No 1-synda L Kitts | Goddard, KS 67052 | $70,060 |
110 | Vivian M Corkill | Corpus Christi, TX 78410 | $69,797 |
111 | Scharmal Schrock | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $69,331 |
112 | Sheryl Schrock | Hazelton, KS 67061 | $69,331 |
113 | Diel & Co A Kansas Corporation | Kiowa, KS 67070 | $69,235 |
114 | Kenneth E Rall | Mill Valley, CA 94941 | $68,865 |
115 | Hunt Bros Ptr | Attica, KS 67009 | $68,669 |
116 | E J Mcguire | Zenda, KS 67159 | $67,596 |
117 | Benjean Browning | Anthony, KS 67003 | $66,019 |
118 | Jay Austin Gates | Anthony, KS 67003 | $65,772 |
119 | Keith Smith | Attica, KS 67009 | $65,739 |
120 | Salvation Army | Hutchinson, KS 67504 | $65,219 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”