Production Flexibility Program in Haskell County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,246
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Haskell County, Kansas totaled $53,262,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Add Land & Cattle Co | Satanta, KS 67870 | $175,150 |
82 | Gale Frank | Copeland, KS 67837 | $175,092 |
83 | Annette Frank | Wichita, KS 67228 | $175,043 |
84 | Jay E Stapleton | Sublette, KS 67877 | $174,133 |
85 | Walter D Koehn | Garden City, KS 67846 | $171,627 |
86 | Mark F Mclain | Sublette, KS 67877 | $169,640 |
87 | Nicki Mclain | Satanta, KS 67870 | $169,623 |
88 | Garry Anthony | Satanta, KS 67870 | $168,202 |
89 | Diaden Farms Inc | Arlington, TX 76012 | $167,375 |
90 | Betty L Anthony | Satanta, KS 67870 | $166,990 |
91 | Wesley Powell Rev Trust | Sublette, KS 67877 | $165,427 |
92 | Ruby M Powell Rev Trust | Sublette, KS 67877 | $163,561 |
93 | Phyllis J Leonard | Sublette, KS 67877 | $163,150 |
94 | Eves Farms Inc | Sublette, KS 67877 | $162,982 |
95 | Warren Nichols Estate | Sublette, KS 67877 | $161,909 |
96 | Forrest Cox | Sublette, KS 67877 | $161,294 |
97 | D Leon Winfrey | Plains, KS 67869 | $161,178 |
98 | Kenneth Nickel | Copeland, KS 67837 | $160,447 |
99 | Howard Pickens Trust | Yukon, OK 73099 | $160,296 |
100 | Russell D Smith | Sublette, KS 67877 | $160,220 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”