Farm Subsidy information
Haskell County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Haskell County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 714
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Haskell County, Kansas totaled $14,934,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Casey S Apsley | Satanta, KS 67870 | $17,547 |
122 | Kent A Dunn | Moscow, KS 67952 | $17,511 |
123 | Maria Berg | Sublette, KS 67877 | $17,485 |
124 | Thomas R Stoppel | Sublette, KS 67877 | $17,469 |
125 | Centera Bank ** | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $17,255 |
126 | Gail Wright | Satanta, KS 67870 | $17,232 |
127 | Shonovan Unruh | Copeland, KS 67837 | $17,030 |
128 | Blake Wiswell | Sublette, KS 67877 | $17,025 |
129 | Shyree Wiswell | Sublette, KS 67877 | $17,025 |
130 | Carlin Koehn | Copeland, KS 67837 | $15,892 |
131 | R W Lucas Farms | Sublette, KS 67877 | $15,846 |
132 | Wilferd - Jacalyn Nichols Rev Trust Nichols | Copeland, KS 67837 | $15,612 |
133 | Marshall Watson | Sublette, KS 67877 | $15,183 |
134 | Larry Unruh | Copeland, KS 67837 | $15,181 |
135 | Bryant Land & Cattle Inc | Copeland, KS 67837 | $15,167 |
136 | Casey Michael Hammer | Sublette, KS 67877 | $15,147 |
137 | Shawntelle Rai Hammer | Sublette, KS 67877 | $15,147 |
138 | Whitaker Inc | Lakewood, CO 80227 | $15,108 |
139 | J & T Stonestreet Farms | Kismet, KS 67859 | $15,056 |
140 | Josephine Ungles Family Trust | Satanta, KS 67870 | $14,814 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”