Conservation Reserve Program in Jewell County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 179
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Jewell County, Kansas totaled $340,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Bill J Loomis | Jewell, KS 66949 | $824 |
102 | Stanley D Colson | Mankato, KS 66956 | $814 |
103 | Luke Shamburg | Beloit, KS 67420 | $811 |
104 | Dennis L Woolsey - Dennis L & Cynthia L Woolsey Re | Hutchinson, KS 67502 | $811 |
105 | Leon Wagner | Esbon, KS 66941 | $790 |
106 | Danny Simmelink | Esbon, KS 66941 | $787 |
107 | Scott Britley Boyles | Superior, NE 68978 | $773 |
108 | Daryl E Cockroft | Jewell, KS 66949 | $768 |
109 | Russell L Dunstan | Formoso, KS 66942 | $766 |
110 | Jamey D Fuller | Burr Oak, KS 66936 | $710 |
111 | Wilson Jewell County Farms LLC | Colorado Springs, CO 80906 | $694 |
112 | Rvoc Intrvs Tr Indenture Of Curtis W Terrill Dtd 0 | Burr Oak, KS 66936 | $669 |
113 | Stephen F Cordel | Cawker City, KS 67430 | $662 |
114 | Janet L Griffith | Smith Center, KS 66967 | $661 |
115 | Ray Mizner | Esbon, KS 66941 | $620 |
116 | Parkhurst Living Trust | Spring Hill, KS 66083 | $604 |
117 | Harold E Flavin Trust | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $600 |
118 | John Garman | Burr Oak, KS 66936 | $596 |
119 | Everett Schoen | Downs, KS 67437 | $579 |
120 | Rita Pohlod | Plymouth, MI 48170 | $546 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”