Total Conservation Programs in Jewell County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 187
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Jewell County, Kansas totaled $458,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Verla Houser | Mankato, KS 66956 | $744 |
122 | , | $744 | |
123 | Donald H Fogo | Esbon, KS 66941 | $726 |
124 | Luke Shamburg | Beloit, KS 67420 | $723 |
125 | Wilson Jewell County Farms LLC | Colorado Springs, CO 80906 | $694 |
126 | Stephen F Cordel | Cawker City, KS 67430 | $662 |
127 | Janet L Griffith | Smith Center, KS 66967 | $661 |
128 | Delmar L Thomas | Downs, KS 67437 | $652 |
129 | Samuel A Mccrory | Sterling, KS 67579 | $652 |
130 | Jed L Black Inc | Beloit, KS 67420 | $634 |
131 | Terril And Alvin J Koops Family Trust | Smith Center, KS 66967 | $624 |
132 | Dwight J Koops | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $623 |
133 | Patricia A Segura | Mankato, KS 66956 | $623 |
134 | Lola F Wilson | Burr Oak, KS 66936 | $608 |
135 | Robert T Wilson Trust | Mankato, KS 66956 | $608 |
136 | Parkhurst Living Trust | Spring Hill, KS 66083 | $604 |
137 | Harold E Flavin Trust | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $600 |
138 | Everett Schoen | Downs, KS 67437 | $579 |
139 | Richard F Schmitt | Cawker City, KS 67430 | $526 |
140 | , | $514 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”