Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program in Kearny County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 127
Recipients of Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program from farms in Kearny County, Kansas totaled $139,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Mark Dale Wedel | Isabella, OK 73747 | $262 |
62 | Kyle Miller | Garden City, KS 67846 | $262 |
63 | Ethel Simshauser Rev Trust | Lakin, KS 67860 | $259 |
64 | Norman F Simshauser Rev Trust | Lakin, KS 67860 | $259 |
65 | Peggy S Pettz | Deerfield, KS 67838 | $250 |
66 | Ronald And Peggy Pettz Trust | Deerfield, KS 67838 | $250 |
67 | Stanton K Redger | Lakin, KS 67860 | $250 |
68 | Ronald & Karen Edgington Trust | Ulysses, KS 67880 | $222 |
69 | Lois Ann Rhodes | Oklahoma City, OK 73105 | $209 |
70 | Lois M Simons Family Trust | Newton, KS 67114 | $209 |
71 | Jeanie Herpolsheimer | Mulvane, KS 67110 | $199 |
72 | Patricia Whitham | Garden City, KS 67846 | $199 |
73 | Michael Foster | Veneta, OR 97487 | $199 |
74 | Mary Ellen Cochran | Beaverton, OR 97006 | $199 |
75 | Larry Kleeman | Wichita, KS 67206 | $192 |
76 | Earle- Rice Patch Tr Rice | Wichita, KS 67206 | $180 |
77 | Clark H Rice | Garden City, KS 67646 | $179 |
78 | Ruthanne D Allen Hunt | Oakland, CA 94611 | $179 |
79 | Freida Depe | Lawton, OK 73507 | $166 |
80 | Lewis Bontrager | Kendall, KS 67857 | $164 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”