Total Conservation Programs in Kingman County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 361
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Kingman County, Kansas totaled $797,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert L Kerschen Living Trust | Cunningham, KS 67035 | $7,046 |
22 | Gary Rohlman | Kingman, KS 67068 | $6,983 |
23 | C Scott Sparks & Karlene K Sparks Rev Liv Tr | Kingman, KS 67068 | $6,796 |
24 | Alice-geisert Rev Trust L Geisert | Kingman, KS 67068 | $6,743 |
25 | Loren L Beshore Trust | Kingman, KS 67068 | $6,718 |
26 | Robert A Bainum | Cunningham, KS 67035 | $6,426 |
27 | Lenard D White Estate | Cheney, KS 67025 | $6,405 |
28 | Don And Loretta Hogg Family Trust | Rose Hill, KS 67133 | $5,997 |
29 | , | $5,878 | |
30 | Helm Farms Inc | Cunningham, KS 67035 | $5,814 |
31 | Michael Tatro | Meade, KS 67864 | $5,702 |
32 | Dennis D Davis-dennis D Davis Trust | Attica, KS 67009 | $5,699 |
33 | Sharon L Kostner Rev Tr | Murdock, KS 67111 | $5,491 |
34 | William J Osner | Cunningham, KS 67035 | $5,387 |
35 | Jeanette A Kerschen Living Trust | Cunningham, KS 67035 | $5,323 |
36 | Arland D Stephens Trust | Norwich, KS 67118 | $5,300 |
37 | , | $5,023 | |
38 | M W W Farms | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $4,992 |
39 | William Dean Johnson | Pretty Prairie, KS 67570 | $4,762 |
40 | Leonard A Probst Trust | Kingman, KS 67068 | $4,601 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”