Total Commodity Programs in Kingman County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,912
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Kingman County, Kansas totaled $165,669,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | David Rohlman | Kingman, KS 67068 | $459,843 |
62 | Scott Brady | Penalosa, KS 67035 | $459,461 |
63 | Robert-belt Living T L Belt | Kingman, KS 67068 | $458,995 |
64 | Hansen Family Dairy Inc | Cunningham, KS 67035 | $456,267 |
65 | Larry Antrim | Kingman, KS 67068 | $452,085 |
66 | Bruce Rohlman | Pretty Prairie, KS 67570 | $449,276 |
67 | Michael B Maloney | Kingman, KS 67068 | $440,768 |
68 | Patrick J Maloney Liv Trust | Kingman, KS 67068 | $439,751 |
69 | Kuszmaul Farms LLC | Murdock, KS 67111 | $439,702 |
70 | Dale Deweese | Cunningham, KS 67035 | $437,976 |
71 | Brian J Maloney | Kingman, KS 67068 | $435,973 |
72 | Robert R Renner | Cunningham, KS 67035 | $434,551 |
73 | Richard M Freund | Cunningham, KS 67035 | $433,717 |
74 | Gage D Young | Cheney, KS 67025 | $432,057 |
75 | Panek Ranch LLC | Cunningham, KS 67035 | $427,542 |
76 | Fredrick Tiesmeyer | Kingman, KS 67068 | $427,277 |
77 | Fred W & Janet L Depenbusch Rev Trust-fred W Depen | Nashville, KS 67112 | $426,916 |
78 | Heath E Weninger | Murdock, KS 67111 | $424,743 |
79 | Dick Adelhardt | Nashville, KS 67112 | $424,546 |
80 | Raymond & Carolyn Kerschen Liv Trust | Cheney, KS 67025 | $422,074 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”