Conservation Reserve Program in Labette County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 69
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Labette County, Kansas totaled $83,082 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dwight J Blackburn-blackburn Rev Trust | Parsons, KS 67357 | $1,107 |
22 | Blackledge Farms Inc | Chetopa, KS 67336 | $1,096 |
23 | Jimmie L Cook | Oswego, KS 67356 | $981 |
24 | Linda Logsdon | Cherryvale, KS 67335 | $907 |
25 | Stephan W Barnes | Rogers, AR 72758 | $888 |
26 | Richard L Babcock | Parsons, KS 67357 | $883 |
27 | Phillip A Boring | Parsons, KS 67357 | $839 |
28 | Fred H Curnutte | Altamont, KS 67330 | $806 |
29 | Larry J March | Cherryvale, KS 67335 | $797 |
30 | Bartie A Black Rev Trust | Mound Valley, KS 67354 | $717 |
31 | Shirley Mcdaniel | Edna, KS 67342 | $682 |
32 | Joseph Underwood | Edna, KS 67342 | $676 |
33 | Rodney J Beneke | Otto, NC 28763 | $651 |
34 | William L & Shirley A Beneke Rev Trust | Parsons, KS 67357 | $651 |
35 | Dale - Dale A Fultz Rev Trust | Parsons, KS 67357 | $590 |
36 | Robert J Miller | Independence, KS 67301 | $567 |
37 | Greg Jarrett | Parsons, KS 67357 | $557 |
38 | Marvin G Mckinney | Parsons, KS 67357 | $555 |
39 | Carl Johnson | Parsons, KS 67357 | $548 |
40 | Susann M Piaszynski | Webster City, IA 50595 | $493 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”