Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Lane County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 93
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Lane County, Kansas totaled $1,424,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | E James Reimer | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $20,010 |
22 | James M Coberly Living Trust | Gove, KS 67736 | $19,614 |
23 | Larry Curtis Vogel | Dighton, KS 67839 | $19,531 |
24 | Jennison Ranch | Healy, KS 67850 | $18,322 |
25 | Kelly Anthony | Satanta, KS 67870 | $16,342 |
26 | Teresa Anthony | Satanta, KS 67870 | $16,342 |
27 | Brian D Leighty | Dighton, KS 67839 | $16,267 |
28 | Russell D Johnson Trust | Gove, KS 67736 | $16,055 |
29 | David N Mellies | Ness City, KS 67560 | $14,918 |
30 | Brant Neil Mellies | Ness City, KS 67560 | $14,918 |
31 | , | $14,716 | |
32 | Coberly Land And Cattle Co Inc | Gove, KS 67736 | $14,711 |
33 | Vance Shay | Healy, KS 67850 | $13,791 |
34 | Rex Whipple Rev Trust | Beeler, KS 67518 | $13,570 |
35 | Tad Davis | Dighton, KS 67839 | $13,028 |
36 | Foos Farms Inc | Dighton, KS 67839 | $12,764 |
37 | Whipple Ranch LLC | Beeler, KS 67518 | $12,764 |
38 | Timothy Miller- Ta Miller Revocable Trust | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $11,736 |
39 | Floyd O Davis | Dighton, KS 67839 | $10,807 |
40 | Max Prose | Beeler, KS 67518 | $10,382 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”